TOPSHAM
Only 44 voters attended a School Administrative District 75 district-wide budget meeting Thursday where they approved a $37.57 million spending plan for 2016- 17.
District residents now get to vote “yes” or “no” on the budget at their local polling places on June 14, known as the budget validation referendum.
The SAD 75 board of directors recommended the $37,574,538 budget. The total local share is $22 million — an increase of $489,021 or 2.22 percent. The overall budget is a 1.77 percent or $652,395 increase.
The school district will lose $440,280 or 1.2 percent in state subsidy, according to Business Manager Steve Dyer.
Due to dropping enrollment, school officials propose to cut two classroom teacher positions. They plan to keep the school resource officer, add a classroom teacher at Williams-Cone School, add a district office administrator for an hour a day, contract for a full-time teacher of the deaf and a half-time interpreter, add money for increased out- of- district transportation costs, replace two vans and purchase diagnostic tools to better assess repair needs of district vehicles.
Based on this proposed spending plan, the local contribution increase could be divided amongst the four communities in SAD 75 as follows:
• A 2.24 percent or $60,160 increase for Bowdoin
• A 2.22 percent or $ 60,598 increase of Bowdoinham
• A 0.84 percent or $64,159 increase for Harpswell
• A 3.41 percent or $304,103 increase for Topsham
There were 20 articles on the meeting warrant which residents voted on, followed by a final summary vote on approval of the budget. One article had to be amended due to a typo.
dmoore@timesrecord.com
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less