LD1396 (The Common Core Repeal Bill) “An Act Regarding Educational Standards for Maine Students” was voted voted “Ought Not To Pass” 12-1.
Normally other legislators take their cues from The Education and Cultural Affairs Committee. But they did not support this bill. Rep. Mike McClellan was the only voice of support. Because of his vote, this bill can make it to the House Floor to hopefully be opened up for a lively discussion and debate about the merits of this bill.
Your voice needs to speak volumes!
I believe the 127th Legislature should restore the K12 public education in the pursuit of happiness, individualism, self-governess, and continual self-improvement. Children need a teacher with a special skill which can generate excitement in a child’s desire to learn, because you can’t do it for them. It is time to restore the true purpose of education and that is the shaping of a human being, intellectually and morally, into a responsible, wise adult. I agree with what Thomas Jefferson stated in a letter to James Madison. He stated that the purpose of education is to develop the soul of a person so that he may govern himself in the governess of others.
The Common Core Standards are copyrighted and actually owned by two private, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) – the National Governors Association Center (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) – out of reach of the “Freedom of Information Act.”
Now is the time to contact your representatives!
Members of the House can be found a http://www.maine.gov/legi s/house/hbiolist.htm; members of the Senate at http://legisweb1.mainelegislature.org/wp/senate/senators.
Call or email them to express your thoughts about the passage of LD 1396 An Act Regarding Educational Standards for Maine Students. The only way the rest of the legislators will take notice on this bill is if they hear from you.
Gordon Draper Bowdoin
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less