
BATH
One of only a few bills spared from Gov. Paul LePage’s veto pen this legislative session will see state institutions increase the amount of local food they purchase to 20 percent by 2025.
The program applies to all state institutions except local schools.
“A strong local food economy has long supported Maine’s coastal and rural communities,” said the bill’s author, state Sen. Eloise Vitelli, D-Arrowsic. “By supporting our local fisheries and farms now, we are making long-term investments in the future of these vital industries. I am so pleased to see this bill become law so local farms and fisheries can continue to power our state for generations to come.”
The bill will become law without LePage’s signature.
Vitelli said she was inspired to submit the bill by farmers at her local farmers’ market, who told her they needed more people buying their products. Robin Chase of Chase Farm and Bakery is the market manager for the Bath Farmers’ Market, where many local food producers gather to peddle their produce. Although unlikely to benefit from the new program since she runs a bakery, Chase was optimistic that it would help other local producers.
“I think it could use more customers,” Chase said. “There’s certainly enough farms in every town in the state of Maine that could provide (state institutions) with local foods. Definitely it would be something to do.”
Chase added that local producers are already “doing everything that we can as a market to incorporate food into the local area.” That includes making locally produced fruits and vegetables accessible to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients at the Bath Farmers’ Market.
“Buying local is huge,” said Chase.
The University of Maine System, which would be affected by the legislation, announced last year that it had already achieved its own goal of reaching 20 percent locally sourced food by 2020.
“We’ve worked for 150 years to support Maine’s agriculture producers (and) Maine fishermen, and we wanted to be a better customer and a better partner of the Maine food economy,” said Dan Demeritt, UMaine’s executive director of public affairs.
In 2017, 23 percent of the food used by the system was locally sourced, with projected spending of around $1.5 million on local foods.
Those goals will be implemented by the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry, who will develop guidelines to encourage local food purchases while minimizing costs. The bill also requires the department to step up education efforts about locally produced foods and make it easier for individuals to use SNAP benefits to purchase local food products.
According to department Communications Director John Bott, the project will start later this year and go through a substantive rulemaking process that will be presented to the Legislature before being aggressively promoted throughout Maine.
Though the department originally testified against the program — claiming that it would an administrative burden and financial burden — Bott noted that the legislation was a good fit for the work the department already does in marketing and promoting Maine food products.
“We see this as another complement to the work that we’re doing,” said Bott. “Obviously, people are very interested in where their food comes from.”
nstrout@timesrecord.com
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less