

The size reduction is the result of “some tenant changes,” explained Frank. The tenants of the development have not yet been identified.
“Last time we were here we had a big-box tenant and that’s what got lost, so that’s changed the leasing and the mix and in doing that we’ve been able to go down to two structures,” added Zeden Jones, an architect at United Growth.
At the meeting in May, board members raised some concerns over traffic flow within the development as well as the design of the storefronts, and city officials seemed pleased last week with the changes the developer had made.
“I like what you’ve done as far as the traffic flow within the site and the change to the architecture so that it’s more of a New England, traditional or small-town village look rather than the big-box institutional look,” said Planning Board member William Southwick.
“The applicant has done what I would say is a very good job addressing the concerns of the board that were raised … at the last meeting,” added City Planner Greg Tansley.
Frank said drivers will be able to access the development through the signalized intersection that marks the entrance to Biddeford Crossing.
“Right now it’s pretty much a gravel drivway to an existing residential home,” he said of the future access way, which will lead drivers to a parking lot behind the buildings.
Since construction crews will be working with a cement fiber product that cannot be used in cold weather, Jones said they should be breaking ground on the project “very soon.”
A plan to develop the property several years ago never moved forward, and according to city documents, United Growth purchased it from Old Dogs of Biddeford LLC last summer.
— Staff Writer Angelo J. Verzoni can be contacted at 282-1535, ext. 329 or [email protected].
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less