BIDDEFORD — Graham Davis scored two goals late in the fourth quarter to cap the only three-goal run for either side in the contest as Massachusetts Institute of Technology secured a 12-10 men’s lacrosse victory over the University of New England on Saturday at the Big Blue Turf.
The Engineers improve to 3-0 on the year, leveling the all-time series with the Nor’easters (3-2) at two games apiece. The net score over the four meetings is 39-39.
The match featured three lead changes before halftime and seven ties, the last coming at 7-7 moments into the final stanza. Chris Cook gave MIT the advantage for good on his second marker with 13:16 left, and Luke Verdi netted one 51 seconds later to establish the first two-goal cushion (9-7) of the game.
After David Rubenstein got UNE back within one a mere eight seconds later, Verdi scored again and Davis struck with 9:35 to go to extend the gap to 11-8.
More than seven minutes ran off the clock before Davis padded the spread with 2:13 on the clock.
Dan Auger and Rubenstein pulled the Nor’easters to 12-10 at the 0:48 mark, but the hosts could not get any closer.
Michael Traub added a pair for the Engineers, while Harris Stolzenberg contributed a goal and four assists.
For UNE, Auger registered four markers and an assist. Sam Cloutier notched a goal and two assists in support.
Between the pipes, MIT goalie Eric Bartell made 11 saves for the win.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less