BOSTON (AP) — The Boston Red Sox have agreed to re-sign Stephen Drew, six months after the shortstop had rejected a qualifying offer from the World Series champions to become a free agent.
Drew, who spent one season in Boston, turned down a $14.1 million offer from the Red Sox last year after helping the team capture their third title in 10 years.
The deal he accepted Tuesday, which is subject to his successfully passing a physical, has a $14 million salary. If he passes the physical and is added to the 40-man roster Wednesday, he would receive a pro-rated amount of $10,021,858.
“We have the ability, provided all things work out, we’ve added a very good player to improve this team,” Boston manager John Farrell said Tuesday before the Red Sox hosted the Toronto Blue Jays.
“That’s the thing Ben and ownership have repeatedly shown,” he said, referring to general manager Ben Cherington, “when a need exists, they’ll do whatever is capable and whatever is available to improve the team. Stephen’s return to us could very well do that. It will add stability to the left side of the infield.”
The 31-year-old may require a minor league stint before joining the Red Sox. Once he is ready, Drew will take over at shortstop and rookie Xander Bogaerts will be shifted to third base.
Third baseman Will Middlebrooks was placed on the disabled list Saturday with a fractured right index finger.
“We had a chance to sit and talk with Xander,” Farrell said. “He’s aware of everything that’s been talked about and reported, and just wanted to be a little bit ahead of things, as to what it might mean to his position going forward.”
The move comes as the Red Sox have lost four straight games, their longest skid since dropping their final eight of the 2012 season.
Drew batted .253 with 13 home runs and 67 RBIs in 124 games with Boston last season.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less