A recently announced proposal by Josephine Power to repurpose a home and buildings into a retreat center on the conservation land known as Timber Point has merit, but unfortunately, Power seems to be putting the cart before the horse.
The property ”“ 57 acres along the coast in Biddeford ”“ was purchased by the Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge in December 2011 for $5.125 million. Power does not have any affiliation with the refuge, nor does she have any claim to the property.
Her proposal focuses on the former home of Charles and Louise Parsons Ewing. The couple purchased the property in 1929, and Charles Ewing, a master architect, designed the home.
The cottage, which overlooks the coastline, has 14 bedrooms, and Power envisions small groups coming to the property for retreats, during which they could learn about the area, environment and conservation. Timber Point Center would be a nonprofit separate from Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge, she said, but would serve both organizations by preserving the cottage and buildings, and teaching people about conservation efforts.
Early plans are to bus people in from a site in downtown Biddeford, which would not only avoid the need for parking and the consequent impact on wildlife, but would also connect the two areas.
Powers’ proposal is certainly intriguing, but we agree with Ward Feurt, manager of the refuge, that it’s premature.
Currently, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, which oversees national wildlife refuges, is not endorsing Power’s plan, nor is it entertaining the possibility until evaluations of the buildings are complete, according to Feurt.
He said earlier this week that the refuge is awaiting final surveys and a comprehensive assessment of the buildings on the property. Although the possibilities remain open for the buildings, Feurt said the refuge has not yet decided what it will do with the buildings.
While the assessments are being completed, Feurt said the buildings are being maintained and the refuge does have the appropriate funds to continue maintenance there.
Power, in an editorial board meeting with the Journal Tribune, said that she would likely serve as the director of Timber Point Center to start, so she is in effect creating a job for herself with this venture. She is currently a caretaker for the Parsons family house, on an abutting lot to the Timber Point property, which the family retained.
It seems the board of the yet-to-be-created nonprofit should be the ones to decide who the director would be if such a project were to go forward, but even before that, U.S. Fish and Wildlife would have to agree to make this proposal a reality by giving Power permission to pursue it. That’s exactly what Power is now seeking, and while we wish her the best in her effort to preserve these buildings and create opportunities for people to learn more about Timber Point, a lot of questions remain unanswered.
While the future of Timber Point Center is unclear, Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge would be well-served to make plans for the buildings and hopefully preserve and reuse them in the future, whether for retreats, education, research or other uses.
Ӣ Ӣ Ӣ
Today’s editorial was written by City Editor Robyn Burnham on behalf of the Journal Tribune Editorial Board. Questions? Comments? Contact Managing Editor Kristen Schulze Muszynski by calling 282-1535, Ext. 322, or via email at [email protected].
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less