
In all bridge contracts, as long as declarer does not lose more tricks than he can afford, he will get something – at the least, a plus score. But success for declarer often depends on the careful handling of losers. In this deal, for example, South was in four spades. West led a low diamond. East won with his king and shifted to the club two. What should declarer have done now?
The auction might have followed several paths. West’s negative double brought hearts into the picture. Then North, with only six losers (three spades, one heart, one diamond and one club), a diamond ruffing value, and a club suit to provide winners, took a shot at four spades.
Even the bartender knew that East had shifted to a singleton club. The original declarer won trick two in his hand and played two rounds of spades, trying to avoid East’s gaining a club ruff. Here, though, East won with his spade queen and switched to a low heart. Then South had to lose two spades, one heart and one diamond.
Stopping the club ruff was a mirage. Declarer should have won trick two on the board and taken a spade finesse. Here it would have won, and South, after cashing the spade ace, could have claimed an overtrick.
Now suppose that the spade finesse lost. Yes, East would have gained a club ruff and shifted to a heart, but declarer could have won with dummy’s ace, drawn the missing trump, and run the clubs for his contract.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less