
A petition to revisit the Pay As You Throw program through a November ballot placement was turned down by the Woolwich Board of Selectmen on Tuesday night.
The program, recently implemented on Sept. 1, requires Woolwich residents to dispose of their trash by purchasing special orange bags provided by WasteZero, an organization that administers PAYT programs throughout Maine communities.
The petition circulated by Woolwich resident Don Adams proposes to place the waste and recycling program on the November ballot so community members can vote in favor of or against the program again.
Adams and several residents contested the validity of the Town Meeting vote that approved PAYT, as the program appeared to have been voted down by a vocal vote before a secret ballot approved the program by 114- 105.
“I feel like any other questions like this should not be on (the) town warrant because it creates a lot of barrier,” Adams said earlier that day.
Kristin Collins, the selectboard’s attorney, advised not to go forward with Adams’ current petition, as the document itself was deficient in several areas.
She said the petition lacked “necessary content,” as the document merely calls for a yes or no vote on the PAYT program. For a ballot question, she said a particular format must be followed.
This would give Adams only 10 days to collect signatures and resubmit an accurate petition, according to Maine law that states a petition should be submitted 45 days before the November election day.
Collins said a court could also consider the attendance of Town Meeting and see whether the turnout justifies the selectmen’s rejection of a petition.
“If it’s a pretty good turnout and if it was pretty recent in time, a court is most likely going to say you are right in refusing the petition because you can’t have this uncertainty in government where something gets to be challenged again and again and you don’t know where to stand,” she said.
Referring to a 1991 case called Dunston v. York, Collins also clarified the authority of the selectboard to decline a petition.
“The contract says you can cancel within 60 days, and presumably any time, but you have discretion to determine, ‘is it too soon? We just voted on this and this portion of the town voted to go forward with this and are we disrespecting them by now possibly reversing it by a different group of people,’” Collins added, addressing the selectboard.
Community members also expressed concern when it was revealed that the town had entered a five-year contract with WasteZero, as many were under the impression that it was only a yearlong contract.
Both Town Administrator Lynette Eastman and Collins confirmed that the contract was a five-year contract with one-year contract renewals following the five years.
Even with the five-year contract, Solid Waste Committee chairman Fred Kahrl reminded residents that they can still choose to vote down PAYT next year at Town Meeting.
“It is a one-year contract because the Town Meeting can block funding next year and there is escape language in the contract, which allows us to leave the contract,” he said. “The town vote is still in control of whether we go beyond.”
The petition failed to pass with four opposing votes.
dkim@timesrecord.com
The orange bags
THE PROGRAM, recently implemented on Sept. 1, requires Woolwich residents to dispose of their trash by purchasing special orange bags provided by WasteZero, an organization that administers PAYT programs throughout Maine communities.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less