PORTLAND (AP) — The first trial of an accused client of a fitness instructor who used her Zumba studio as a front for prostitution ended abruptly when a judge threw out key evidence, but prosecutors said they’re prepared to move forward with another eight cases in which defendants sought jury trials.
The trial of former Kennebunk High School hockey coach Don Hill ended in acquittal Tuesday when Justice Roland Cole barred prosecutors from showing jurors Alexis Wright’s business ledger. The judge previously ruled that Wright didn’t have to answer questions in the trial in Alfred.
Without Wright’s testimony or her ledger, prosecutors were left with only graphic photos of the two engaging in sex but no proof of money changing hands, the judge said.
“We believed the evidence was admissible. The judge disagreed and we respect the judge’s decision and we’ll move on to the next case,” said Deputy District Attorney Justina McGettigan.
Defense lawyer Gary Prolman said he and Hill are “ecstatic” about the outcome of the case. “It has been a long time coming,” he said. “From day one (Hill) has said there was never sex for money.”
The trial became testy with Prolman suggesting the ledger was mishandled by law enforcement officials and calling into question the chain of custody.
Prolman told jurors in York County Superior Court in his opening statement Monday that Hill believed he was in a relationship with Wright and that he never paid her for sex.
The prostitution scandal in the quiet seaside community of Kennebunk gained attention because of the large number of clients — as many as 150 — many of whom were videotaped without their knowledge. Clients included a former mayor, a minister, a lawyer and a firefighter.
Hill, 53, of Old Orchard Beach, was one of 68 people charged so far with paying for sex with Wright. Fifty-nine of them have pleaded guilty or no contest.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less