
The roars grew longer, the applause louder, with each game and each point that carried Andy Murray closer to ending Britain’s 77-year wait for a men’s champion at Wimbledon.
Then, with Murray suddenly needing merely one point to end his grueling final against Novak Djokovic, the 15,000 spectators filling Centre Court at the All England Club hushed long enough for play to resume. Murray lost that point. As well as his second championship point. And, yes, his third, too.
Grand Slam success did not come quickly or easily for Murray earlier in his career, and it certainly did not come recently for the British at their revered grass-court tournament, so there was something fitting about the way the last game dragged on, the tension growing, the long wait a little longer still.
When a fourth championship point eventually arrived, nearly 10 minutes after the first, the normally relentless Djokovic finally yielded, pushing a backhand into the net to cap Murray’s 6- 4, 7-5, 6-4 victory Sunday.
The match was over. The angst was gone. Murray — and all of Britain — could celebrate.
“That last game will be the toughest game I’ll play in my career. Ever,” said Murray, who is Scottish. “Winning Wimbledon — I still can’t believe it. Can’t get my head around that. I can’t believe it.”
Until Sunday, no British man had won Wimbledon since Fred Perry in 1936.
“I obviously wanted to try and win this for myself,” Murray told the crowd, cradling his new gold trophy, “but also I understand how much everyone else wanted to see a British winner at Wimbledon, so I hope you guys enjoyed it.”
The ceremony’s emcee described the closing game as “tortuous to watch,” and Murray, with perfect comedic timing, piped up, “Imagine playing it.”
When the 210th, and last, point went Murray’s way, the ball landing on Djokovic’s side of the court, the new champion dropped his neonred racket, yanked his white hat off and pumped both fists overhead, screaming, “Yes! Yes!” He kicked a ball into the stands. He fell to his knees, then covered his eyes with his hands, before walking over to high-five some fans.
An earsplitting ovation rang out in the arena, soon giving rise to chats of “Andy! Andy! Andy!”
Murray Mount cheers
Across the grounds, thousands responded with cheers while watching on a giant videoboard at the picnic lawn known as Murray Mount. And, surely, millions more following along on TV across Britain stood up from their sofas. British Prime Minister David Cameron was in the Royal Box, a sign of the day’s significance, and Buckingham Palace confirmed that Queen Elizabeth II sent Murray a private message afterward.
“The end of the match, that was incredibly loud, very noisy,” Murray said. “It does make a difference. It really helps when the crowd’s like that, the atmosphere is like that. Especially in a match as tough as that one, where it’s extremely hot, brutal, long rallies, tough games — they help you get through it.”
He climbed up to the guest box for hugs with several people, including his girlfriend and his coach, Ivan Lendl, an eight-time major champion as a player who never fared better than runner-up at Wimbledon.
Murray then started to head back down to the court when he realized he’d forgotten to find his mother, British Fed Cup captain Judy Murray, and went back to hug her, too.
Speaking about Lendl, Murray said: “Ideally he would have won it himself, but I think this was the next best thing for him … He believed in me when a lot of people didn’t. … He’s been very patient with me. I’m just happy I managed to do it for him.”
Only two men in tennis history lost their first four Grand Slam finals: Lendl and Murray. A defeat against Roger Federer in last year’s Wimbledon title match dropped Murray to 0-4.
That day, Murray’s voice cracked and tears rolled as he told the crowd, “I’m getting closer.”
How prescient. Four weeks later, on the same court, he beat Federer for a gold medal at the London Olympics, a transformative victory if ever there was one. And 52 weeks later, on the same court, he beat Djokovic for the Wimbledon championship.
In between, Murray beat Djokovic in five sets at the U.S. Open in September for Grand Slam “You need that self-belief in the important moments,” observed Djokovic, a six-time major champion, “and he’s got it now.”
This was their 19th meeting on tour (Djokovic leads 11-8), and their fourth in a Grand Slam final, including three in the past year. Both are fantastic returners, and Murray broke seven times Sunday, once more than Djokovic lost his serve in the preceding six matches combined.
Admittedly feeling the effects of his five-setter Friday against Juan Martin del Potro — at 4 hours, 43 minutes, it’s the longest semifinal in Wimbledon history — Djokovic wound up with 40 unforced errors, nearly double Murray’s 21.
“I wasn’t patient enough,” Djokovic said.
Ah, patience. For fortnight after fortnight, decade after decade, Wimbledon began with much fanfare and ended with much disappointment for the British, who love their tennis and the tournament they refer to simply as The Championships.
Seen for a while as the best chance to deliver a title, Murray shouldered plenty of pressure and expectations lately.
“It’s hard. It’s really hard. You know, for the last four or five years, it’s been very, very tough, very stressful,” Murray said. “It’s just kind of everywhere you go. It’s so hard to avoid everything because of how big this event is, but also because of the history and no Brit having won.”
The phrase “the last British man to win Wimbledon was Fred Perry in 1936” became part of the national conversation. Thanks to what happened Sunday, that changes forever.
As of now, the last British man to win Wimbledon was Andy Murray in 2013.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less