BRUNSWICK
After failing to gain committee favor by only a single vote, a prospective bill to give Brunswick and Topsham direct appointments to the Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority Board of Directors now will have to win approval during a floor argument in the House of Representatives.
The bill, LD 1476, authored by Rep. Mattie Daughtry, D–Brunswick, left Friday’s work session in the Joint Standing Committee on Labor, Commerce, Research, Economic and Community Development tied, with six votes each “ought to pass” and “ought not to pass.”
Sen. John Cleveland, DAuburn, cast the tie-breaking vote Monday afternoon. Attempts to reach Cleveland for comment today were unsuccessful.
Town officials long have complained that redevelopment of the former naval air station is being done without enough — or, at times, any — municipal input.
MRRA’s board is appointed by the governor. Although five of the board’s 13 members live in Brunswick, their charge is to act as advocates for business, not necessarily for the town.
State Sen. Stan Gerzofsky and Rep. Charlie Priest, Democrats who both represent parts of Brunswick, lobbied against the bill. Gerzofsky called it redundant and “unnecessary.”
Daughtry this morning said she believes the bill was scuttled for reasons other than policy.
“I’m disappointed that the committee didn’t debate the policy aspects of the bill and instead focused on backroom politics,” Daughtry said.
“It was a piece of commonsense legislation that didn’t get a fair chance. I’m hoping I can win votes on the floor.”
No date yet has been set for LD 1476’s floor apearance.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less