ORONO
Make no mistake about it.
The swift-skating and skillful University of Notre Dame from South Bend, Indiana, was clearly the better hockey team in Saturday night’s 4-2 Hockey East victory over the University of Maine at the Alfond Arena in Orono as evidenced by its 40-19 advantage in shots on goal.
But the Black Bears were in position to pull off the upset when they took a 2-0 lead on goals by Blaine Byron 26 seconds into the game and Brendan Robbins 3:03 into the second period.
Yet again, the Black Bears’ penchant for taking ill-advised penalties occurred as Notre Dame used power-play goals by Jordan Gross and Dylan Malmquist to tie it in the second period before Malmquist scored the even-strength game-winner 2:46 into the third period and Andrew Oglevie added an insurance goal with 3:39 remaining while the teams were at even-strength.
Gross’ goal came on a 5- on-3 power play, while Malmquist’s tying goal was in a 5-on-4.
Junior goalie Cal Petersen, making his 80th straight start, made 17 saves for Notre Dame (17-9-4 overall, 10-5-3 HE), while senior Matt Morris rejected 36 shots for the Black Bears (10- 17-3, 4-13-1).
The Irish were gifted the opportunity to cut into the deficit when rare simultaneous penalties were called on Robin Hoglund (charging) and Peter Housakos (tripping) at the 8:25 mark of the middle period.
It took just 19 seconds for them to capitalize when Anders Bjork found Gross in the middle of the slot and Gross one-timed a 25-foot blast past Morris.
UMaine had an eight-second 5-on-3 later and an ensuing 5-on-4 power play in the second period but couldn’t convert and then lost its one-man advantage when Schurhamer took a tripping call with 2:13 left in the period.
The Irish eventually went on the power play and Bobby Nardella snapped a perfect diagonal pass to Malmquist at the bottom of the left circle and he directed the puck past the helpless Morris.
UMaine will visit Merrimack for a pair next weekend, while Notre Dame entertains Providence for a two-game set.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less