
A border state coveted both by North and South, Kentucky was at the crossroads of the Civil War and Confederate and Union fighters fought on Oct. 8, 1862, in its crossroads town of Perryville.
Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg had invaded Kentucky in the fall of 1862, nearly reaching Louisville before falling back. In central Kentucky, more than 50,000 federal troops caught up with Bragg’s army and skirmishing on Oct. 7, 1862, led to a wider battle the next day at Perryville.
Savage combat saw Confederate fighters pummeling a Union flank, then forced back under a Union counterattack. Fighting raged for hours. But in the end, the weary rebels under Bragg retreated at night following the battle, headed for eastern Tennessee. Thus a major Confederate incursion to take Kentucky ended with the Union in control of the border state.
The Union’s strategic victory was not without a cost. Perryville’s bloody combat claimed more than 7,400 in dead, missing and wounded on both sides — but more heavily on the Union side.
Elsewhere, The Associated Press reported in early October of 1862 that Abraham Lincoln’s preliminary Emancipation Proclamation stirred anger in the Southern slave states and Confederate calls to redouble the fight.
One AP dispatch quoted The Richmond Whig newspaper as saying Lincoln’s proclamation aiming to eventually free of slaves in states in rebellion was tantamount to “ordering servile insurrection in the Confederate States.” Said The Richmond Whig, it was “a dash of the pen to destroy four thousand millions of our property, and it is as much as a bid to the slaves to rise in insurrection — with assurance of aid, from the whole military and the naval power of the United States.”
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less