BOSTON
The start of a program to equip 100 Boston police officers with body cameras has been delayed so a judge can consider a request from the city’s largest police union to temporarily halt the program.
The pilot program was expected to begin this week after months of negotiations between the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association and the city. The sides reached an agreement in July calling for 100 officers to volunteer to wear cameras for six months.
But when no officers volunteered, Police Commissioner William Evans assigned officers to wear the cameras. That union then filed a lawsuit alleging the city violated the agreement.
A hearing on the union’s injunction request is scheduled for Sept. 6.
Police spokesman Lt. Detective Michael McCarthy said Wednesday that the city agreed to delay the start of the program until Sept. 12.
“The commissioner’s hopes have been that we get the pilot program up and running as soon as we can. He still wants to get the program up and running,” McCarthy said.
John Becker, a lawyer for the union, said the union is not attempting to stop the program, but objects to the decision to order 100 officers to wear cameras when the union’s agreement with the city called for volunteers.
“We’re supportive of the program,” Becker said.
“But you can’t have a process where you spend eight months negotiating an agreement, then when one thing doesn’t go as expected, everything gets thrown away,” he said.
Becker said the injunction request seeks to stop the city from implementing the pilot program until the two sides can negotiate a new agreement.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less