Recently I’ve noticed that a few of the books on the top 10 New York Times Bestseller list have been related to accounts of spiritual journeys or Near Death Experiences (NDEs). The most popular in the past few months have been neurosurgeon Dr. Eben Alexander’s Proof of Heaven, and Heaven is for Real, a novel dictated by 4- year old Colton Burpo. These accounts answer something man has asked himself since the beginning of time: what really does happen when we die?
I have always seen religion and science as forces working against each other. I was raised as a Catholic school girl surrounded by people who had no doubt that there is a God. In this community of believers I struggled because I am logical to a fault. I have doubted my faith in recent years because of my “seeing is believing” mentality. Science is so tangible, so provable. It’s easy to comprehend the Big Bang, evolution, etc. But imagining heaven? How could that be proved?
Dr. Alexander’s novel opened my eyes to a whole realm of evidence that God exists. NDEs, especially those so vivid and indescribably real as Dr. Alexander’s, are “proof” that physical death is not the end for us. Recently many scientists have set out to study whether man has a soul. Things such as NDEs and Extra Sensory Perception (ESP) have begun to be seen as gateways to the spiritual world, becoming a much more respected field of study.
I hope to one day live in a world where science and religion not only peacefully coexist, but also work together. There is a middle ground between the literal translation of the Bible and the “hard evidence” that man does not have a soul. In the end these things go hand in hand. Both religion and science are real and I believe we should value both.
Carolyn Moore
Hyde School
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less