WEST BATH
Cases of local interest heard in Sagadahoc County courts in February:
Kristoffer Park, 36, of Fairhaven, Mass., a charge of domestic violence assault, was pled to another charge, for an incident in Bath on Oct. 30, 2013.
Randolph Pelkey, 51, of Woolwich, guilty of reckless conduct, sentenced to seven months in jail, all suspended, one year probation, a charge of unlawful possession of a scheduled drug, was pled to another charge, for an incident in Woolwich on Dec. 19, 2013; guilty of violating condition of release, sentenced to 20 days in jail, two additional charges of violating condition of release, were pled to other charges, for incidences in Topsham on Jan. 8, 12, and 13.
Daniel H. Pellegrini, 39, of Litchfield, charges of aggravated assault, criminal restraint and domestic violence criminal threatening, with domestic violence priors, were dismissed due to insufficient evidence, for an incident in Topsham on July 14, 2013.
Kenneth Pinard, 23, of Lewiston, guilty of aggravated criminal mischief, sentenced to 45 days in jail, stayed until March 21, 2014; guilty of theft by unauthorized taking or transfer, sentenced to 45 days in jail, stayed until March 21, 2014; guilty of burglary, sentenced to two years six months in jail, all but 45 days suspended, stayed until March 21, 2014, two years probation, $4,902.81 restitution, for an incident in Bowdoin on July 12, 2013.
Richard W. Polgar, 47, of Bath, a charge of driving to endanger, was pled to another charge, for an incident in West Bath on May 20, 2013.
Amanda Pratt, 34, of Brunswick, a charge of failing to make an oral or written accident report, was dismissed, for an incident in Bath on Nov. 3, 2013.
Eric J. Pray Rahkonen, 19, of South Thomaston, guilty by default (a no show), of the use of drug paraphernalia, $300 fine, for an incident in Bath on Jan. 9.
Joyce M. Pye, 77, of Bath, guilty of operating under the influence, $750 fine, license suspended for 90 days, for an incident in Bath on Nov. 23, 2013.
Jeremy D. Reed, 36, of Edgecomb, a charge of operating a vehicle after registration suspended, was dismissed, for an incident in Bath on Dec. 11, 2013.
Marcelino M. Rivera, 50, of Topsham, guilty of violating condition of release, sentenced to 48 hours in jail, stayed until March 8, 2014, for an incident in Topsham on Sept. 14, 2013; a charge of violating condition of release, was pled to another charge, for an incident in Topsham on Oct. 16, 2013.
Alicia Alice Rodriguez, 20, of Portland, guilty of disorderly conduct, with fighting, $200 fine, for an incident in West Bath on Dec. 20, 2013.
Melania Sliker, 56, of Bath, guilty of violating condition of release, sentenced to 48 hours in jail, for an incident in Bath on Feb. 19.
Michael Stone, 44, of Clinton, guilty of failure to register a vehicle, $200 fine; guilty of operating a vehicle while license suspended or revoked, with priors, $500 fine; a charge of unlawful possession of a scheduled drug, was pled to another charge, for an incident in Richmond on Oct. 20, 2013.
John R. Sullivan, 53, of Woolwich, guilty of operating under the influence, $750 fine, sentenced to three days in jail, stayed until April 25, 2014, license suspended for 150 days, for an incident in Bath on Dec. 14, 2013.
Sebastian R. Usami, 27, of Topsham, a charge of operating a vehicle while license suspended or revoked, was dismissed, for an incident in Topsham on Nov. 14, 2013.
Alan R. Webber, 27, of Harpswell, guilty of violating condition of release, $1,000 fine, for an incident in Bath on Nev. 13, 2013.
Ethan M. Zwaan, 23, of Woolwich, guilty of operating under the influence, one prior, $700 fine, sentenced to six months in jail, all but 10 days suspended, stayed until April 25, 2014, one year probation, license suspended for three years; a charge of operating a vehicle without a license — with conditions or restrictions, was pled to anther charge, for an incident in Bath on Nov. 9, 2013.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less