AUGUSTA
A bill that aims to boost solar power in Maine faces long odds after failing to win the support of Republicans on a key legislative panel.
Environmental groups, power companies and local rooftop solar installers support the bill, which would address the contentious issue of “net metering,” a long-standing financial incentive used in Maine and other states to subsidize solar power.
Utilities would buy surplus electricity at rates set by regulators instead of paying retail prices, which is the current practice. The bill also would let utilities sign 20-year contracts with residential solar customers and lift barriers on community owned and large solar farms.
But Republicans on the Legislature’s energy committee on Tuesday opposed the legislation because of fears it would increase the electric bills of people who don’t have solar panels and increase energy costs for businesses.
A 20-year contract doesn’t make sense because solar technology is changing so quickly, said Rep. Larry Dunphy, who caucuses with Republicans.
“I am not against solar,” he said. “I am just against having my neighbor pay for my solar.”
Republicans offered two alternative proposals, and both would doom the solar industry in Maine, said Vaughan Woodruff, owner of a small solar business in Pittsfield and chair of the renewable energy committee on the Maine Association of Building Efficiency Professions.
“The question is which one kills the solar industry in Maine quicker,” he said.
At issue is a billing practice called net metering, which requires utilities to provide a one-to-one credit to solar customers on their bills for the surplus power they generate and feed into the grid.
Unless the Legislature takes action this session, the Public Utilities Commission is expected to review net metering rules. Maine’s solar installers and environmental groups fear that the commission will eliminate net metering and remove all incentives for installing solar. Gov. Paul LePage, an opponent of solar, appointed the members of the commission.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less