To the editor:
We have been listening to the various arguments, some favoring and some opposing, locating the proposed railroad maintenance facility close to a residential neighborhood.
I cannot help but wonder how many of us would favor such a proposal, should the plan suggested be in our backyards.
Cost for constructing any project is certainly important, all things being equal, but here they are not equal. I believe locating the facility in a quiet residential area is unfair.
Is it really needed, and in that neighborhood area; is it absolutely needed?
Are there no other appropriate locations? Has the industrial park been thoroughly looked at? A Cook’s Corner site — even at added cost to the proposal?
Brunswick, several years ago, denied a commercial retail establishment to be located at the corner of Stanwood and Pleasant streets, even though, in that instance, I recall most of the neighbors favored the proposal.
Are we moving against neighborhoods? Do we have something against them?
If a private enterprise made such a proposal as presented here, with lower cost being suggested as a rationale for justifying locating something in an area that is clearly not a good place, I do not think it would be looked at favorably.
An environmental assessment certainly seems appropriate, and a more acceptable site explored thoroughly and fairly even again.
Dick Morrell,
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less