IN THIS Jan. 26, 2011, file photo, a man stands near an advertisement for an Apple iPad in Shanghai, China.

IN THIS Jan. 26, 2011, file photo, a man stands near an advertisement for an Apple iPad in Shanghai, China.

BEIJING (AP) — Authorities have seized iPads from more Chinese retailers in an escalating trademark dispute between Apple Inc. and a struggling local company that could disrupt global sales of the popular tablet computer.

Shenzhen Proview Technology claims it owns the iPad name in China, and a court ruled in its favor last year. This week, the Chinese company said it will ask customs officials to stop imports and exports of iPads, which are made in China.

A website run by newspaper China Business News said Thursday iPads were seized in the central city of Zhengzhou and the eastern port of Qingdao. Seizures were reported earlier in Shijiazhuang and Xuzhou.

Proview said it has asked regulators in more than 40 cities to investigate possible trademark violations.

Chinese media say Proview is deeply in debt, and observers have suggested the company needs a large settlement to repay creditors.

“We’ve appealed to Apple through its agents to have a settlement, but so far we haven’t received any response from them,” said a Proview lawyer, Xie Xianghui. He declined to say how much Proview wants.

An employee of the press office of Zhengzhou’s Administration of Industry and Commerce confirmed some iPads were seized there.

“One of our local offices seized iPads from a shop and sealed them off based on the Chinese Trademark Law, although we did not carry out a city- wide seizure,” said the employee, who would give only his surname, Jiang.

A spokesman for Qingdao’s Administration of Industry and Commerce said he knew of no order to seize iPads but said the agency was monitoring the legal process.

“We’re investigating iPad sales in the city and will move quickly once there is a final legal judgment,” said the spokesman, who would give only his surname, He.

A spokesman for Weihai’s commerce agency said he knew of no citywide seizures but said local offices might be investigating sales or collecting evidence.


filed under: