AUGUSTA ( AP) — After taking a break last year from endorsing state borrowing for public projects, Maine lawmakers on Thursday began considering a list of more than two dozen bond issue proposals totaling nearly $600 million.
The Appropriations Committee began two days of public hearings on the borrowing proposals, which call for projects ranging from highway and rail line improvements to global seafood marketing. The largest, which comes up today, calls for $200 million to build a privately operated container port on Sears Island.
Last year, the Legislature decided not to ask voters to approve any borrowing in an effort to chip away at the state’s debt load. While lawmakers this session are considering the possibility, there’s no guarantee any borrowing proposals will pass in the Legislature.
According to the state treasurer’s office, Maine had $520 million in general obligation bond debt as of June 30. Taxsupported debt per capita is $ 865, much lower than the national median of $1,066, the treasury says.
The Appropriations Committee’s House chairman, Rep. Patrick Flood, said the committee will review all of the proposals and consult with legislative leaders to see whether any new borrowing is called for. If any bond package emerges at all, it will be much smaller than the total now on the table, said the Winthrop Republican.
Any bond package would likely appear in no more than three or four bills, said Flood. The committee would let the governor take the lead if he decides to submit a package, he added.
Gov. Paul LePage is not actively considering a bond package but “ the door’s slightly ajar,” said his spokeswoman Adrienne Bennett.
“We still have a significant chunk of the budget to deal with. The governor believes we need to be in a healthy fiscal state before we take on more debt,” said Bennett.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less