Chances are most readers have never heard of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a right-wing group that has fueled reactionary legislation across the country, including Florida’s notorious “Stand Your Ground” law.
That was the law that many blame for the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, the 17-year-old boy who was gunned down by a neighborhood watch volunteer on Feb. 26. Trayvon was walking down a suburban Florida street having visited a convenience store to buy soft drinks and candy.
Pressure has been brought to bear on a number of large corporations that help fund ALEC’s work, which allegedly promotes “pro-business” legislation in state legislatures across the nation. The ALEC staff drafts model bills that conservative, mostly Republican, lawmakers push in the individual states. Two of these companies, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, have withdrawn in the wake of the Trayvon Martin case.
The work of ALEC goes far beyond “pro-business” legislation like right-towork laws and efforts to break public employees’ unions. Other model legislation that the group has advanced include bills targeting illegal immigrants and those that would limit voter participation by requiring photo identification cards.
Progressives rarely attack their opponents with the white-hot vengeance that the archconservatives employ. And organizations like ACORN don’t get funded by corporations like Kraft Foods (which refused to drop its membership, even after criticism), Coca-Cola and Pepsi.
But a push for greater transparency of action groups like ALEC is under way. They deserve the glare of public exposure, and the corporations that fuel its agenda need to feel the heat from the citizens who are targeted by this vicious agenda.
— The Courier-Journal, Louisville, Ky.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less