To the editor:
First, Brunswick purchased the old Times Record building to house municipal departments in 2004.
After further debate, town officials decided it is unusable.
They should have done a better study before buying a building.
They’ve talked about using it for storage or for a bus garage. Now they talk about demolishing it because it’s too costly to run or renovate.
What’s next?
The Harriet Beecher Stowe School is brand new, but still does not have enough room for students. Part of the reason is closing Jordan Acres and Longfellow schools before studying the facts. Whoever did their homework, if any, would get a failing grade in any school.
Last, but not least, is the proposed police station. Where was the study of all needs and wants before purchasing the property on the corner of Mill and Stanwood streets?
Also, it seems areas such as communications, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, to name a few, should be looked into before approving the building plans.
A new police station for Brunswick is needed, and we have spent 40 years talking about and — yes — studying the situation, but in the end the study has flaws that anyone in the know should have found.
I do know one thing for sure: Brunswick knows how to spend, spend, spend our money. And now the taxpayers are being forced to pick up the tab.
The solution is to stop spending unless it’s necessary and know the difference.
Judy Gorby
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less