To the editor:
Any person who wishes to become a naturalized citizen of the United States must pass a test.
I presume the test asks questions about how the government functions as well as historical facts. I wonder how many of the American voting public could pass that test?
Recently, Wisconsin’s governor survived a recall vote. His team outspent his opponent’s team seven to one.
Right now, Mitt Romney, the presumed Republican candidate for president, is gaining ground in the polls and in the fundraising race with President Obama.
Romney boasts that he can bring the American economy back on track. I wonder to which track he refers?
Ronald Reagan’s track, where taxes were lowered for the richest Americans and the military budget and the deficit soared?
G.W. Bush’s track, where two unfunded wars were started under false pretenses and taxes were cut for the rich and the deficit soared?
If the present trend continues, Romney will win because whoever raises the most money, wins. This is a pitiful reflection on the American voting public. Whichever candidate slathers the airwaves with the most unsubstantiated blather, wins the election.
The conclusion must be that most people sit mindlessly in front of the blue light night after night and believe the outrageous claims put before them.
This is a test: Under which of the last four presidents was the economy the strongest?
Bart Chapin
Arrowsic
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less