AUGUSTA (AP) — The coalition supporting a proposal to recognize same-sex marriage in Maine said Thursday it was pleased by Secretary of State Charlie Summers’ decision to revise the wording of the question to be posed to voters on the Nov. 6 ballot, while opponents called the new wording fair.
Summers announced that the final language will ask: “Do you want to allow the State of Maine to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples?”
The secretary, Maine’s top election official, proposed a shorter question last month, which asked: “Do you want to allow same-sex couples to marry?”
Same-sex marriage supporters who called for additional wording during a 30- day comment period said the new wording makes it clear that the proposed law is about civil marriage and that no church or religious institution can be sued for refusing to recognize or perform a marriage. They had opposed the first question advanced by Summers, saying it was incomplete and inaccurate.
“We are pleased that the secretary of state took into account our concerns and has changed the question to more accurately reflect the contents of the citizens’ initiative,” Matt McTighe, campaign manager for Mainers United for Marriage, said in a statement.
Summers said his office, with input from senior staff, took into account all of the comments that were received during the 30-day comment period when creating the new wording of the question which will appear on the ballot.
A leader of Protect Marriage Maine, a political action committee that opposes the referendum, said the new question finds a satisfactory middle ground.
“I would have preferred it to have language asking whether you want to redefine marriage,” said the Rev. Bob Emrich, chairman of Protect Maine Marriage.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less