To the Editor:
This is an open letter to members of the National Rifle Association.
Ask yourselves these questions:
If the killer of the kids in Connecticut had no access to firearms, would the death toll be as high?
If, as the NRA maintains, “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people,” would this degree of mayhem have occurred?
How does this incident relate to “a well regulated militia …”?
I believe, after sanity checks, hunters should have access to firearms provided they eat what they kill.
And the military? Only in our defense.
I’m an old man. To advise is the most and the least I can do. Please consider the following carefully:
If the NRA doesn’t have your support, it is weakened.
Better than letting your NRA membership lapse as a result of this incident, why not cancel it and thereby make a louder protest?
Bob Dale
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less