The U.S. government should not — nay, cannot — be in the business of discrimination.
When it affords rights and privileges to one class of individuals — estate rights, tax statuses, etc. — it cannot withhold them from another.
So it’s pretty clear the U.S. Supreme Court should strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8 as capricious abridgements of liberty.
It should go further, end the ambiguity, and establish a constitutional right to same-sex marriage that would apply to all 50 states.
Your views may vary. Feel free to abhor homosexuality. But in a legal sense, there is nothing about allowing gay people to marry that deprives you of your personal liberty.
Conservatives, especially, should be wary when government seeks legal grounds to limit the personal pursuit of happiness.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less