
U.S. Sen. Angus S. King Jr., I-Maine, told a top Navy official Tuesday of “Maine’s vast importance to the Navy” regarding shipyard operations at Bath Iron Works.
King met with Sean J. Stackley, the assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition, who is responsible for all matters relating to Navy acquisition policy and programs, King’s staff said in a news release.
“Their conversation particularly focused on the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 shipbuilding procurement plans for BIW,” King spokesman Scott Ogden said in a news release.
King supported the Consolidated Continuing Appropriations Act — which the Senate passed March 20 — authorizing funds for current and future shipbuilding contracts for which BIW can compete.
The Consolidated Continuing Appropriations Act authorizes more than $4 billion for the Navy to purchase three DDG-51 class destroyers in fiscal year 2013; and $466.2 million in advance procurement funding to allow the Navy to purchase up to seven more DDG-51s to be built between fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2017. BIW can compete for both these contracts if final approval is reached.
The act also authorizes $669.2 million to continue to support the construction of the three Zumwalt DDG-1000 class destroyers procured in fiscal years 2007 to 2009 — all of which are currently being built at BIW.
“Between Bath Iron Works and Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Maine’s contributions to our Navy cannot be overstated,” King said. “I felt it was important for me to underscore that point to the assistant secretary.
“The men and women at these facilities conduct worldclass work which is at the very heart of our Navy’s unrivaled strength. I wanted him to know it’s critical for the Navy to continue to look to these facilities — particularly BIW which falls directly within his purview — as the department allocates its resources for the coming years.”
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less