
As a matter of background, I have more than 20 years’ experience in a similar position for a quasi-public development corporation in Massachusetts. In my job at the Lawrence (Mass.) Economic Development and Industrial Corporation, we managed loans ranging from $50,000 to $300,000. We reported to the cty council through the mayor and community development director, so as to assure the city’s development goals were being met.
In addition to this volunteer position, I was employed as an analyst and capital markets trader for Lehman Brothers and EF Hutton. In my career, I have never seen a forgivable loan from any source — public or private.
I was reasonably satisfied with the answers from board members regarding their qualifications. One BDA member is in banking, another is a CPA, another is a local businessman.
So let me ask: With the seemingly varied and wellrounded backgrounds of the aforementioned individuals, has anyone ever seen a bank make a forgivable loan? Or loan to a company that has a negative net worth?
I think not, which brings me to one of many points I would like to raise: Why would Brunswick Taxi get such a forgivable loan? Why would the BDC commit nearly 10 percent of its net worth to one entity without any type of return?
Is this sound business? Not in any of my textbooks.
I had a number of questions when the chair called for one more and adjourned the meeting, so I will ask now:
What is the BDC policy on loans? What are the underwriting standards? Who reviews the terms and conditions of the loans? How does the BDC develop minimum performance standards? Who writes the loan documents? Do the documents have negative covenants? How does the BDC get leads? What is the relationship between the town and the BDC? Does the BDC employ outside counsel? If so, who and how much?. Are there other relationships between the BDC members and the Town Council? When was the last time the BDC called for outside candidates (not former elected politicians) to fill vacancies?
The business of the public should be seen and held in full view of the public, with public input. The fact that the BDC recommends its own members to the Town Council is stunning. It would be more seamless if the Town Council called for and interviewed candidates, thus securing a more representative body, rather than the current composition, which has led some to feel the BDC is an incestuous collection of political retreads.
This loan, and the BDC’s inattention to detail proves to me the banker, the economic development expert, the town manager, the CPA and the lawyer were a lot more than remiss in their duties. They are derelict in their duty to protect BDC from default.
Kudos to Bill Morrell whose refusal to support this boondoggle demonstrates his and his family’s sense of honor and commitment to the town.
Rather than call this a forgivable loan, why not identify it for exactly what it is: a sweetheart deal. The frustrating part is there is nothing we can do about it.
Meanwhile, Dale King is sitting behind his desk lighting cigars with our money while we have legitimate businesses that also need our help (i.e., the gluten-free bakery burned out 16 months ago).
If BDC members can look in the mirror and believe in their hearts the Brunswick Taxi Loan was a legitimate business deal, so be it.
If not then you have irreparably violated the public trust and should resign.
DANIEL FORD is a Brunswick resident and retired financial services executive.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less