To the Editor:
After attending the Oct. 23 Brunswick School Board workshop on charter schools, I am concerned the board’s knowledge of the required approval process is woefully inadequate.
Because the board has failed to educate itself about the law, its process is already fatally flawed. Under the statutes, it must issue a Request for Proposals and publicize it broadly. Then, it must thoroughly review all applications submitted.
Finally, it must “[f]ollow charter-granting policies and practices that are transparent, based on merit and avoid conflicts of interest or any appearance of a conflict of interest.”
Unfortunately, it appears that a conflict of interest already exists.
Since October 2012, the board has been considering a proposal from Phippsburg resident John Stadler. An ad hoc committee has met alone with Mr. Stadler on multiple occasions, and it is apparent the committee has discussed financial details with him.
Statements made by School Board Chairman Jim Grant in the newspaper and on television have already put the board at legal risk if it approves Mr. Stadler’s application but not others. In short, he has made it clear that he is eager to proceed into a partnership with Mr. Stadler.
The board has a long relationship with the law firm of Drummond Woodsum, and I suggest it contact the firm for advice. A few thousand dollars spent on legal fees is worth avoiding a judgment of several hundred thousand dollars in favor of a disgruntled applicant or a deficit of several million dollars incurred during a fumbled attempt to create an ill-conceived charter school.
Michelle A. Small
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less