BRUNSWICK
Planning Board members tonight will decide whether to once again approve a final site plan for the 19-lot, fourphase Brunswick Commerce Park.
William Moore, president of Moore Properties Inc., first submitted plans in 2008 for the 94-acre project tucked between U.S. Route 1 and Durham Road.
It was approved in June 2009 and an amended plan approved four months later. However, the final site plan approval never was recorded in the Cumberland County Registry of Deeds, which is required by state law within 60 days of the Planning Board’s decision.
Town officials discovered the error while doing title and deed research for one of the potential new owners.
The original site plan included four residential lots, 14 commercial-industrial parcels and a 31-acre piece that would remain in its current natural state under Moore’s ownership. A 2,230-foot-long paved access road loops through the development, but currently is barricaded to keep motorists out.
Three of the residential lots already have been sold and one house built, with an occupancy certificate awarded. A fourth house lot is under contract, but the sale can’t be closed until the bookkeeping mess is cleaned up, said Town Planning Director Anna Breinich.
Breinich said she didn’t know why the deeds were never recorded.
Neither does the town’s engineer.
“It’s the developer’s responsibility to record the deeds,” Breinich said.
Also tonight, board members will hold a workshop with Cara and Cecile Stadler, the owners of Tao Restaurant on Pleasant Street, regarding a possible expansion.
The Stadlers also would like to build an aquaponic greenhouse and underground parking facility adjacent to the existing structure
The meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. in Town Council Chambers at Brunswick Station.
¦ WHAT: Planning
Board
WHEN: 7 p.m.
WHERE: Second-floor
public meeting room,
Brunswick Station, 16
Station Ave.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less