The proposed Regional School Unit 21 expansion projects on which Kennebunk, Kennebunkport and Arundel residents will be voting this Jan. 21 are a poor use of taxpayer dollars at this time.
No doubt, the schools of RSU 21 may need some attention, but the current proposal is calling for what appears to be a fantastic wishlist of expansion items, such as a 500-seat theater in a stand-alone arts building, reconfiguration of athletic fields, etc.
The proposed price tag for this wishlist is $74 million. For this West Kennebunk homeowner with a very modest residence of 1,000-square-feet on a quarter acre, this expansion comes with an increase of 9.3 percent, or $180 per year. This projection doesn’t take into account any additional tax increases that may occur during the length of the bond, or the reductions in state funding aid being passed along to municipalities.
How many folks on fixed incomes or family farms will have to relocate so Kennebunk can sport a stand-alone arts center at the high school?
As a taxpayer, it is so disappointing to see this lavish proposal as the only offer on the ballot, before we even know how much more we’ll be paying as a result of the increases to municipalities in the governor’s budget. If our schools are truly in such poor shape that it will take $74 million dollars to fix them, what have we been doing spending our money replacing trees downtown, building curb cutouts and potting flowers in little wooden boats?
This taxpayer would like to see a reasonable proposal for appropriate maintenance to the RSU 21 schools available for a November ballot, one that won’t tax us out of our homes and family farms. Please get out to vote no on the current RSU 21 bonds.
– Steven Kelley, Kennebunk
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less