BIDDEFORD — Attorneys for two Biddeford men charged with stabbing and using a brick to beat another man allege prosecutors deliberately withheld evidence and are asking that charges against their clients be dismissed.
Just days before 23-year-old Tamer Tilahun and 22-year-old Jonathan Dowd were scheduled to go to trial in November on attempted murder and other charges, their attorneys found they were never given audio recordings of witness interviews, including one in which the victim’s girlfriend described yelling racial insults at Tilahun, who is black, according to the Associated Press.
Dowd, then 20, and Tilahun, then 21, both of Biddeford, were arrested in November of 2011 after an alleged brawl near the Saco-Biddeford city line.
Police were called to the Elm Street Bridge on Route 1 around 1 a.m. on Nov. 20, 2011, according to Saco police statements the week of the call.
A 27-year-old man sustained severe injuries including a stab wound to the torso and extensive injuries to the head and face, according to Saco police statements. Police said a 32-year-old male pedestrian from Saco stopped to help the victim and was allegedly threatened with a brick by Dowd and Tilahun, but was not injured.
Defense attorneys said in court Tuesday that prosecutors acted “maliciously.” Authorities say the failure to hand over evidence was a simple mistake, the AP reported.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less