AUGUSTA (AP) — Republican Gov. Paul LePage supports a teenage mother’s right to make medical decisions on behalf of her brain-damaged daughter, putting him at odds with child welfare workers who won a judge’s approval for a do-not-resuscitate order.
LePage said Monday in a statement that Virginia Trask should be able to make medical decisions, including lifting the judge-approved do-not-resuscitate order, as long as her parental rights aren’t revoked.
“Unless a parent is deemed unfit and parental rights are severed, the state should not override a parent’s right to make medical decisions for their own child,” he said.
Trask’s daughter, Aleah Peaslee, was 6 months old in December when she was shaken by her father while she was a work, authorities said. The father is awaiting trial next month on aggravated-assault charges.
Trask originally agreed to a do-not-resuscitate order because of the severity of her daughter’s injuries. But she changed her mind when her daughter, who had been removed from life support and placed in her arms, opened her eyes and began breathing on her own.
Nonetheless the injuries are severe: The girl is blind and cannot hear, requires a feeding tube because she cannot suck or swallow and will never advance beyond an “early infantile level,” according to court documents.
A state judge who gave child welfare officials authority to make medical decisions found that “neither parent can be counted on to be physically or emotionally available to make the necessary informed decision when needed.”
Upon learning of the matter, LePage immediately called for a full review of how these decisions are made, and the commissioner of the state Department of Health and Human Services raised concerns as well.
Maine’s supreme court is scheduled to hear arguments this month.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less