BOSTON (AP) — A cousin of former New England Patriots player Aaron Hernandez was sentenced Tuesday to two years of probation after pleading guilty to contempt for refusing to testify before the grand jury that indicted Hernandez in the 2012 killings of two Boston men.
Tanya Singleton, of Bristol, Connecticut, changed her plea to guilty during a hearing in Boston. Singleton has been battling a recurrence of breast cancer, which her lawyer says is incurable and cannot be adequately treated if she is in jail.
Attorney E. Peter Parker had asked the judge to spare her jail time and instead sentence her to two years of probation with a year of home confinement. That was the same sentence she received in Bristol County last month when she pleaded guilty to a separate contempt charge for refusing to testify before the grand jury that indicted Hernandez in the 2013 shooting death of semi-professional football player Odin Lloyd.
“Ms. Singleton’s best chance to maximize the time she has left with some semblance of quality of life would be to maintain a complex and increasingly aggressive treatment regimen implemented by the Connecticut physician who has been treating her since her original cancer diagnosis three years ago,” Parker wrote in a sentencing memo.
Parker said Singleton, who is 17 years older than Hernandez, “loves him as if he were her own son.” He said she “chose family” when she was subpoenaed to testify before the grand juries investigating her cousin.
Prosecutors had sought 2 1/2 years in jail for Singleton. District Attorney Daniel Conley said she “made a deliberate choice to stymie a double homicide investigation.”
Hernandez has pleaded not guilty to murder in the deaths of Daniel de Abreu and Safiro Furtado after one of the men accidentally spilled a drink on him at a Boston nightclub. He also has pleaded not guilty to murder in Lloyd’s killing. The body of Lloyd, who was dating the sister of Hernandez’s fiancee, was found near Hernandez’s North Attleboro home.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less