On Election Day, Maine voters will be asked to decide whether to retain or eliminate the baiting of bears or the use of hunting dogs. Most of the support for this public question comes from out-ofstate animal rights groups who actually oppose all hunting. That view does not take into consideration senior or disabled hunters and it does not address the problem if long-range shots in wooded areas.
Elderly hunters and those who suffer from physical disabilities benefits from methods that bring game closer. Baiting and dogs are a big help to such sportsmen. As to the well-being of the bears being hunted, longer-range hits among heavy shrubs and trees are certain to produce more wounded animals that will go off to suffer and die without being properly harvested. Moreover, these hunters are likely to keep going until they can register a clean kill on another bear.
For these reasons, I respectfully recommend that hunters and their supporters vote NO on Question 1.
Bob Jørgensen
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less