WELLS — Former Chief Justice Daniel Wathen and attorney Adam Steinman will present their perspectives on beach use and shoreline ownership on Oct. 23 from 6-7:30 p.m. at the Wells Reserve at Laudholm. This is the final program in the series, “From Moody to Goose Rocks: Public Access and Private Ownership of Maine’s Shoreline.”
“Legal issues surrounding shoreline access are complicated, so we are delighted to provide the public with an opportunity to learn from people who have been involved in debating them at the highest level,” said Paul Dest, director of the Wells Reserve, organizer of the series.
Wathen wrote the minority opinion in the Moody Beach decision and joined the majority in the Wells Beach decision, which granted the Town of Wells a public easement on that beach. He served for 20 years on the Maine Supreme Judicial Court and was Chief Justice from 1992 to 2002. Wathen is currently in private practice focusing on mediation.
Steinman presented arguments before the Maine Supreme Court in 2011 in a case that expanded the definition of allowable public uses of the intertidal zone. He is an environmental lawyer and environmental scientist who has represented the Maine chapter of the Surfrider Foundation, a national organization that works to improve access to the country’s coast for recreation and public enjoyment.
A question-and-answer session will be moderated by attorney and law professor John Duff. Maine Sea Grant and the Maine Coastal Program assisted with the series.
A $5 donation is requested, and registration is required. To register, call 646-1555 or email [email protected].
For more information, visit wellsreserve.org/beach.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less