SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (AP) — A Springfield church has voted to split with the Presbyterian Church USA over differences in theological beliefs.
Members of the First and Calvary Presbyterian Church voted Sunday for the split, with 72 percent of those voting approving the decision, The Springfield News-Leader reported. The church also recently received a restraining order to keep the local governing body from interfering in the church’s operations.
While some churches have left Presbyterian Church USA in recent months over its more lenient teachings on samesex marriage and gay clergy, Senior Pastor Andrew Chaney said his church decided to split because of changing teachings on the divinity of Christ, the authority of the Bible and because governing bodies are becoming more involved in local churches.
He cited new language adopted by Presbyterian Church USA in a governing document that says members are united through diversity, including “theological conviction,” which means people of different faith beliefs are welcomed in the church. Chaney said First and Calvary members generally believe only one conviction should unite the church.
“This statement can lead to the position that we don’t have to have personal faith in Jesus Christ in order to be a Christ-follower, which heads down the path of universalism,” he said.
He said in an email to the newspaper that First and Calvary members also want the church to concentrate on its central mission of spreading the Gospel, rather than becoming involved in political issues.
There has been “40 years of leftward political involvement which included such diverse causes as support of Marxist rebels in Latin America and calls for various boycotts” of businesses, Chaney said.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less