It’s not what Bostonians want to hear: The Farmers’ Almanac says another rough winter is in your stars.
A year after Boston was pummeled with the snowiest winter on record, editors of the Maine-based publication have dubbed their latest forecast a “winter deja vu,” hearkening to last winter’s misery across the Northeast.
Using a formula built on sunspots, moon phases and tidal action, the 199-year-old almanac that hits newsstands this week predicts cold and snowy weather from Maine to Montana.
“Say it isn’t snow!” quipped editor Peter Geiger.

Also, the unseasonably cold temperatures are supposed to dip down as far as Kentucky this winter, the almanac says. Editors predict milder weather out West, and chilly and wet weather for the South.

Modern scientists consider such methodology to be tomfoolery. But long-term forecasts can be vexing even for conventional scientists.
Mike Halpert, deputy director of the Climate Prediction Center, likened longterm forecasts to finding a “small signal embedded in a lot of noise.” The center’s forecast for the past mild winter was largely correct, except for frozen New England. The “polar vortex” provided another surprise for the federal forecasters during the previous winter.
Last winter, the almanac’s prediction of “shivery and shovelry” came true in New England, where Boston recorded more than 100 inches of snow — nearly 65 inches in February alone — and set a new snowfall record. But the almanac didn’t nail it everywhere: out West, it was unusually warm while the almanac projected cool temperatures.
The almanac is a timehonored tradition with gardening tips, weather, astrology and life hacks. Those topics are resonating with younger readers, not just old-timers.
The almanac distributes 1 million retail copies and 2.5 million promotional versions.
But it also has 350,000 subscribers to a weekly email blast, 850,000 Facebook followers, nearly 25,000 Twitter followers and more than 13,000 Instagram followers. There’s also an app for smartphones and tablets.
“It’s not your grandparents’ almanac, anymore,” Geiger said.
As for the weather, the editors will let the criticism roll off if their forecast misses the mark. “All of us can take a lesson from the weather,” said managing editor Sandi Duncan. “It pays no attention to criticism.”
LAST WINTER, the almanac’s prediction of “shivery and shovelry” came true in New England, where Boston recorded more than 100 inches of snow — nearly 65 inches in February alone — and set a new snowfall record.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu

Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less