LOS ANGELES – A jury hearing a case against an Ohio man charged with stalking Gwyneth Paltrow heard testimony Tuesday about pornographic messages and sex toys he sent her earlier in her career.
Paltrow’s former bodyguard Dennis Bridwell read some of the explicit messages he said were sent by Dante Soiu to the Oscar-winner roughly 17 years ago.
Lynda Westlund, an attorney for the 66-year-old Soiu, repeatedly objected to Bridwell’s testimony about the items that were part of the previous case that resulted in Soiu being sent to a mental institution for several years.
The current case focuses on Soiu’s recent messages to Paltrow. He is accused of sending Paltrow 66 letters and packages between 2009 and 2015, with some containing messages about religion, his desire to marry her and her death.
He has pleaded not guilty to felony stalking. Westlund described him in her opening statement as a Christian who wrote repeatedly to Paltrow in an attempt to minister to her.
Westlund argued outside the presence of the jury that the older messages – which described sexual fantasies involving Paltrow and various sex toys sent to her – were too prejudicial.
“They’re hand-picked for super damaging content,” Westlund argued. “It’s just purely being offered for inflammatory reasons.”
Judge Mark E. Windham ruled the messages might add context for jurors to understand Paltrow’s fear of Soiu.
“That’s why it’s all the more disturbing that these letters were sent,” Windham said about the more recent messages.
Westlund characterized Soiu’s recent writings to Paltrow as “biblical and religious ramblings.”
The testimony came during the second day of Soiu’s trial. Bridwell is one of the final prosecution witnesses.
Paltrow cried Monday when a prosecutor asked her whether Soiu’s writings made her fear for the safety of her children. She also told jurors she was upset when she learned in 2009 that Soiu was writing her again.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less