
The Michaels Cue-Bid is pretty ancient because Michael Michaels died in 1965. But it continues to shower good results on users.
If the opener bids one of a suit, and the next player overcalls two of that suit, over one of a minor, he is showing at least 5-5 in the majors; and over a major, at least 5-5 in the other major and either minor. In this case, if the advancer (the Michaels Cue- Bidder’s partner) wishes to ask for the minor, he bids two no-trump. The intervenor rebids at a minimum level unless he has a strong hand (typically 17 points or more), when he jumps in his minor.
In today’s deal, South leaps to four clubs. Then North scrapes up a raise with his two useful honor cards and ruffing value in spades.
After West leads the heart 10, how should South plan the play?
As dummy’s trumps are so low, declarer should assume that spades are 4-3 and allow for a 4-1 trump break. He wins with dummy’s heart ace, unblocks the spade queen, plays a trump to his hand, ruffs a spade in the dummy, draws the remaining trumps, and runs the spades. He loses only two diamond tricks.
Finally, what would it mean if North had bid three clubs, not two no-trump? In the old days, that would have been natural, showing l-o-n-g clubs. But now, most experts treat that bid as weak, asking partner to pass with clubs or rebid three diamonds. Then, the two-no-trump inquiry promises some game interest.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less