Jonathan Crimmins ( The Times Record, April 20) was mistaken in reporting one of my legislative votes. Writing about a bipartisan welfare reform bill, Mr. Crimmins said I was one of “more than 30 House members who voted against its passage.”
This is false.
This compromise welfare reform bill prohibits TANF funds from being spent on listed items such as alcohol, cigarettes and lottery tickets. This consensus bipartisan bill was finally passed and enacted “under the hammer,” without a division or roll call.
The sole recorded vote on this bill, Roll Call 645, was not on passage of the reform bill at all. This earlier preliminary vote was on a narrow amendment, setting penalties.
The bill as voted in committee required simple repayment for the first violation, a 3 month disqualification for a second violation, and a 6 months disqualification for additional violations. The floor amendment increased the penalties to a 3 month disqualification for a first offense, a full year for a second offense, and up to 2 years for additional violations.
The only issue on the roll call vote was choosing between these two levels of penalties. Reasonable people can differ. I happen to think the floor amendment was too harsh. TANF covers about 5,000 families at any one time, mostly single mothers with children.
Thank you for letting me correct this mistake.
Ralph Tucker
State Representative, District 50
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less