PORTLAND
More than four hours after Game 3 began Rob Flick scored of an odd-man rush to give the Portland Pirates a 2-1 American Hockey League victory over the host Hershey Bears in Game 3 of the Atlantic Division semifinals Thursday Night.
The triple overtime contest snapped a 15 year franchise record by 64 seconds.
The win gives the Pirates a 2-1 edge in the best-of-five series, with Game 4 slated Saturday at 7 p.m. in Hershey.
Flick accepted the pass from Rob Schremp before one-timing the shot from the right-wing circle that beat Justin Peters at 3:10 of the third overtime period.
For the second straight game it was a goaltenders duel with the first period ending in a scoreless deadlock.
Nathan Walker broke the stalemate, converting on a nice feed from Dustin Gazley at 5:27 of the second period to give the Bears a 1-0 lead. That was the only goal Hershey slipped past Mike McKenna, as the netminder put on a show in shutting the Bears out over the final 77:43.
The Pirates had six powerplay opportunities in the frame but were unable find the back of the net. But, Portland found the equalizer in the third period after killing of a big 5-on-3 Hershey advantage after Jonathan Racine was called for hooking followed by a Corban Knight infraction for high-sticking.
In his first game since being reassigned by the Florida Panthers on Wednesday, Greg McKegg beat two Hershey defenders before depositing the puck into the back of the net on a wrap-around shot to knot the game at 6:28 of the third period. Brett Olson collected his second playoff point with the second assist going to Brent Regner.
Two extra overtime periods and a combined 84 shots didn’t settle things. The Pirates found the back breaker in the third OT when Schremp feathered a saucer pass to Flick’s blade. The forward released the one-timer that banged off the inside right post and in, clinching the 2-1 Pirates’ win.
McKenna put on an impressive performance, backstopping 41 saves. Peters stopped 42 shots.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less