
Victor Hugo said, “Mankind is not a circle with a single center but an ellipse with two focal points of which facts are one and ideas the other.”
At the bridge table, you use the known facts to form an idea of how to try to make or break the contract. Also, if you can see two chances to succeed, that is twice as good.
In today’s deal, how should South play in four hearts after West leads the diamond queen: king, 10, two?
If it is part of your methods, North could respond three no-trump to show 13- 15 points with a 3-3-4-3 or 3-3-3-4 distribution, leaving opener to decide between three no-trump and four hearts (or a slam). Otherwise, North should bid two clubs, planning to jump in hearts on the next round to show a game-force with exactly three-card heart support.
South should see a potential loser in each suit. Maybe the trump finesse will work, but if he takes it immediately and it loses, another diamond would require declarer’s establishing a club winner in the dummy for a spade discard.
However, perhaps West has the spade king. Then dummy’s queen can become a winner. South should hope that West has one of the major-suit kings. At trick two, declarer plays a spade to his ace, then leads his second spade. Here, West wins with the king and plays another diamond, but South takes that trick on the board and pitches his last diamond or the club jack on the spade queen. Then he can try the trump finesse for a possible overtrick.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less