
“Well, I tried to visit a bridge club and play in a duplicate at each port of call. It wasn’t always possible, because the schedules of the ship and the club did not mesh. But I did play with and against a lot of interesting people.”
One new member asked if any of the deals had been particularly memorial. In the background, someone whispered “rookie error” because the SLM tended to be long-winded.
Well (answered the SLM), there was this textbook declarer-play problem that faced my partner during a duplicate in Auckland, the beautiful major city of New Zealand. It highlighted a difference between pair and team events.
I agree with my partner’s three-diamond rebid. With only four losers, that hand was too strong for a non-forcing two diamonds.
My partner won the first trick with the club ace, cashed her top diamonds, and ruffed a diamond with my heart nine. However, disaster struck when East over-ruffed and returned a trump. Now my partner had to lose two spades, one diamond and the over-ruff.
To be fair to my partner, she immediately said that she knew she could have guaranteed her contract by ruffing the third diamond with dummy’s heart ace. But as she mentioned, if the first diamond ruff passed off safely, she was a big favorite to win a valuable overtrick.
In theory (the SLM concluded), she had made the right play, but it had not worked – unlucky.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less