
Bridge partners have agreements, mostly about bidding, but they are of no use if a partner forgets one. In addition, the basic system introduces its own restrictions. In today’s deal, for example, how should the bidding continue in Standard and in two-over-one game-forcing?
In Standard, South would rebid three hearts to show extra values and six-plus hearts. North would take control with (Roman Key Card) Blackwood and hopefully get to seven hearts.
In two-over-one, South rebids two hearts (because three hearts promises a solid suit). North raises to three hearts, and a two-over-one problem arises. Neither player knows the strength of his partner’s hand, except that it is worth an opening bid. When a major is agreed at the three-level, if South now control bids four clubs, it shows extra values and the club ace – a serious slam-try. With a middling hand, he continues with an artificial three no-trump. With a minimum, he signs off in four hearts.
How should South play in seven hearts after West leads the club jack to dummy’s king?
Declarer should play a heart to his ace, discard a spade on the club ace (do not draw another round of trumps), lead a spade to the ace, return to the spade king, ruff the spade jack with dummy’s heart jack, draw trumps, and claim.
Finally, although bidding agreements are great, you and your partner should spend much more time than you do now discussing defense.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less