FREEPORT
At the request of L.L. Bean, the Freeport Appeals Board tabled an appeal of Codes Enforcement Officer Fred Reeder’s decision regarding a cemetery road running through the Freeport retailer’s Outdoor Discovery School.
According to Reeder, the project review board will first weigh in on whether L.L. Bean was correct in its interpretation of the board asking them to show the historical road on their final plans.
“My only input and decision was based on the ordinance requirement that whatever shows on a final approved plan is to be done on the face of the earth,” Reeder said. “Bean’s is back to the project review board to get a clarification on what the PRB meant by asking that the Mann Cemetery access be shown on the plan.”
L.L. Bean did, in fact, show the historic road to the area containing two cemeteries — the Mann Cemetery, as well as a larger adjacent graveyard. After providing deeded access to the cemetery through the neighboring Ulrickson property, the tote road that ran through what has become the new L.L. Bean paddling center was loamed and seeded over.
Reeder said the question remains — that if the road was marked on L.L. Bean’s final plans, was it there to be built or was it only for historical purposes?
The Mann Cemetery Association has had issue with the current arrangement, saying the deeded access across Ulrickson property pertains only to the association, leaving out the relatives of more than 170 buried in the 300-year-old cemetery.
The association’s John Mann said relatives of others buried in the graveyard have been sent across Ulricksons’ private property by the town — something not covered by the deeded access.
Reeder said hopefully it will all be settled at the Sept. 13 project review board meeting.
dmcintire@timesrecord.com
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less