RIO DE JANEIRO — The United States could make another bold statement in women’s field hockey at the Olympics on Monday.
A win over No. 3 Australia would give the Americans victories over two of the world’s top three teams in its first two Olympic matches. The Americans defeated No. 2 Argentina 2-1 in their opener on Saturday.
Another win would not only add confidence, it would move the squad closer to qualifying for the quarterfinals. The top four teams in each six-team pool advance.
The Americans also could deal a blow to Australia. The Hockeyroos dropped their opener to Britain 2-1 on Saturday.
“Obviously disappointed to start with a loss,” Australia defender Georgina Morgan said. “But I think the standard we set was pretty good, and we obviously want to improve each game, so I think that’s probably a good place to start.”
“We play a very fast, attacking, countertype of hockey, and I think you’ll see that that comes out throughout the tournament,” Morgan said. “I think you saw a lot of it (against Britain). When we’ve really got the run of play, I think it’s quite hard to defend.”
The United States defeated Australia in the Champions Tourney in June to capture third place and set the tone for the Olympics.
The Americans bounced back from a sluggish start to defeat Argentina. The United States limited Carla Rebecchi, one of the world’s best scorers, to two shots and no goals.
Even after Saturday’s victory, the Americans remained focused on growth and letting the results take care of themselves.
“We don’t shy away from our mistakes and things we can learn,” Briggs said. “We don’t shy away from it. We take it head on. We try to improve and learn and grow from how we played before.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less