

After a tight first frame, the visiting Phoenix got hot and got hot fast, jumping out to an 11-2 run in the second quarter and forcing a Freeport timeout. It hardly slowed things down, as the players in green kept getting open and the shots kept falling.
By halftime, the Falcons’ two-point deficit had turned into a 17-point deficit and that was that.
Spruce Mountain went on to win, 66-46.
“Tonight, about a four minute stretch,” Freeport coach Bill Ridge said. “We mentally broke down. When we got back, we played a good second half — down three in the second half, down two in the first quarter. So the 15-point second quarter, that’s the difference.”
It started with the final shot of the first quarter, which was a 3-pointer from junior guard Mason Shink that gave Spruce Mountain (3-0) a 16-14 lead. Then, to begin the second, Shink and Caulin Parker hit two more back-to-back treys to force a timeout from Ridge.
All that came after the break was a bucket inside and three straight Phoenix treys.
“We didn’t close down,” Ridge said. “We jogged back on defense, which made us a step slow closing out and we didn’t do a great job of communicating.”
Nearly all of the 3-pointers came from quick dishes outside from guards Austin Darling (15 points, six assists) and Noah Preble (15 points, five rebounds). Shink also scored eight of his 13 total points and splashed two treys during the decisive 21-6 second-quarter run.
“Fortunately for us, you make a couple shots and the energy picks up,” Spruce Mountain coach Scott Bessey said. “All the sudden you want to play defense a little bit harder. Shouldn’t be that way, but unfortunately that’s the trap we fall into. Our energy is related to us
Bessey didn’t have to worry about energy for the rest of the night as, on top of the shot making, Spruce Mountain was also setting the tone with a pressure-packed, high-tempo game plan. Swished 3-pointers were often followed by steals and more shot attempts, leaving Freeport (0-3) flustered.
“When we played them full court, man-to-man straight up with no traps, I think that worked the best,” Shink said. “They didn’t like our pressure.”
“We like to go that high energy,” Ridge said. “We’ve got a lot of good athletes on our team, but we’re asking to play at kind of two speeds. We’re asking to go as hard as they can and then when they get the ball, to be slow and be patient. That can be tough for kids and that’s what we saw tonight.”
Pressure back
Freeport played a high-press of its own to start the game and jumped out to a 4-0 lead after a pair of Spruce Mountain turnovers. The tactic worked throughout the frame, where Toby Holt (eight total boards) and Connor Dostie (five total boards) pulled in offensive rebounds and converted on multiple second-chance buckets. The Phoenix missed all outside shot attempts in the frame and things were dead even.
“I didn’t think it was going to be easy,” Bessey said. “We beat them by 30-plus last year, plus it’s a road game. They’re kids, so a little bit of over-confidence, no matter how much you talk about it, seeps in. I feared that we may start flat and that’s what happened.”
Eventually, though, Darling made one extra cut or Parker found the open man and the Freeport pressure snapped.
Suddenly there was an open shooter on every play.
“When they broke our pressure, we’d be kind of in a scramble,” Ridge said. “Which is good, and that’s actually kind of what we shoot for when they break the pressure, but nobody was communicating so there was a breakdown and they got that penetration kick.”
Once Spruce Mountain got comfortable and starting dictating play on both ends of the floor, both coaches knew what was coming.
“We played our basketball,” Shink said of the second quarter. We didn’t let them dictate what we did. Our decision making was way better. We started knocking down some shots, which helps.”
“I knew that if we could just hit a couple shots that we could get our pressure going, get them going fast, turn them over, get easier shots,” Bessey said. “That’s kind of what happened.”
Holt, who sat out most of the fourth quarter, paced the Falcons with a team-high 15 points on top of six offensive boards. He converted a hoop-and-harm play at the start of the third quarter that briefly cut the lead down to 14, but both sides scored 15 in the frame.
Ethan Sclar hit one of only two Freeport treys on the night and finished with seven points, while Matt Neilsen notched eight and Caleb Salter pulled down four rebounds in the fourth quarter.
Spruce Mountain 66, Freeport 46
At Freeport High School
| Spruce | Mt. — | 16 | 21 15 | 14 | — | 66 | ||
| Freeport | — | 14 | 6 | 15 | 11 | — | 46 |
Spruce Mountain — Austin Darling 5-4-15, Caulin Parker 3-3-10, Noah Preble 3-3-10, Cameron Mitchell 0-0- 0, Tyler Poisson 0-0-0, Brett Frey 2-0- 5, Mason Shink 5-0-13, Jordan Daigle 1-0-2, Kayle Stewart 0-0-0, Andrew Shaw 2-0-4, Nick Lombardi 0-0-0, Tate Walton 0-0-0, Carson Gross 1-0-2. Totals — 25-8-66. Freeport — Connor Dostie 2-0-4, Joe Burke 1-0-2, Matt Neilsen 3-2-8, Reid Poissonnier 0-1-1, Eric Pelletier 0-0- 0, Josh Burke 0-0-0, Caleb Salter 0-0- 0, Ethan Sclar 3-0-7, Colby Wagner 0-1-1, Nate Thomas 1-0-2, Toby Holt 6-3-15, Eriksen Shea 1-0-2, Clay Canterbury 1-0-3, Kaleb Barnett 0-1-1. Totals — 18-8-46. 3-point field goals — (SM) Shink 3, Preble 2, Darling, Parker; (F) Sclar, Canterbury. Records — Spruce Mountain 3-0, Freeport 0-3. Up next for the Falcons — Tuesday at Sacopee Valley, 6:30 p.m.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less