PHIPPSBURG
It will likely be another few weeks before the Maine Department of Environmental Protection makes a determination on a permit to remove pilings in Phippsburg according to Director of Communications David Madore.
“The parties have asked for a draft order, so that’s going to extend the approval time frame out slightly by about three to four weeks, most likely,” said Madore.
The permit to remove the pilings was first submitted by Jack and Susan Parker, who own a summer home overlooking the pilings, in September 2016. At a public meeting in Phippsburg in November, Jack Parker explained that he was motivated to remove the pilings out of environmental concerns, claiming erosion of the beach as a major factor.
Parker, the CEO and President of Reed & Reed Construction in Woolwich, stated at the meeting that he would pay for the removal of the pilings himself.
The draft order allows the parties involved to look at what the department is planning to do with the permit and gives them an opportunity to provide feedback prior to the permit being issued. Without the request for a draft order, the deadline for a determination on the permit would have been this week.
The Maine DEP was not able to immediately confirm who had requested the draft order.
nstrout@timesrecord.com
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less